<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Got Ruby?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janosmucsi.thruhere.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janosmucsi.thruhere.net</link>
	<description>Things can be done betteR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:18:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Utility functions in Flex by Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://janosmucsi.thruhere.net/2009/11/utility-functions-in-flex/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janosmucsi.thruhere.net/?p=13#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Very interesting use of the function object.
I was just wondering:
If you are thinking about encapsulating the properties in this package by using this top level component: public function MYCO():Object {...}, so the properties can not clash with properties of other components, could the class definition( such as: public class MYCOextends {...} ) serve this purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting use of the function object.<br />
I was just wondering:<br />
If you are thinking about encapsulating the properties in this package by using this top level component: public function MYCO():Object {&#8230;}, so the properties can not clash with properties of other components, could the class definition( such as: public class MYCOextends {&#8230;} ) serve this purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
